J. Amati Mehler underline that there is a tendency to confuse the ability to use one’s
psychoanalytic listening and our psychoanalytic tools with doing
psychoanalysis. This is a crucial issue today. The two might be, and
nowadays are, much confused.
She writes that a fundamental danger to the survival of psychoanalysis comes from the tendency to neglect the impact of so many parallel training “schools”, fostered by IPA analysts themselves, that thrive all around the world. Short-cut training is offered as well as low-frequency-session training analyses. These institutions are an unrecognized significant threat to:
She writes that a fundamental danger to the survival of psychoanalysis comes from the tendency to neglect the impact of so many parallel training “schools”, fostered by IPA analysts themselves, that thrive all around the world. Short-cut training is offered as well as low-frequency-session training analyses. These institutions are an unrecognized significant threat to:
1. the identity of psychoanalysis as a discipline and as a specific method and setting;
2. the minimal standards of training requirements.
Such parallel institutes based on our discipline contribute to the
confusion between psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. They also foster
cultural deceit of the public who do not know exactly what therapy they
are getting since everything close to a “talking cure” is called
“analysis”!
Vedi anche il video della Dr.ssa Argentieri in merito alla formazione psicoanalitica.
From:
http://www.ipa.org.uk
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento